Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2002

State v. Lomax

State v. Lomax
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 28, 2002 · Counsel, Douglas, Moyer, Resnick, Stratton
94 Ohio St. 3d 1444; 761 N.E.2d 1054; 2002 Ohio LEXIS 271

State v. Lomax

Opinion of the Court

Sandusky App. Nos. S-97-037 and S-99-014. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Appeals for Sandusky County. Upon consideration of the motion for recusal of the Sandusky County Prosecutor’s Office,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for recusal be, and hereby is, granted.

Douglas, J., would also appoint counsel. Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent'. Resnick, J., not participating.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the oral argument scheduled in this case for January 29, 2002, be postponed until further order of the court.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent. Resnick, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑