Ohio Supreme Court, 2002

State v. Fisher

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 4, 2002 · Sweeney

94 Ohio St. 3d 1484; 763 N.E.2d 1183; 2002 Ohio LEXIS 526

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

State v. Siller, Unpublished Decision (4-17-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State v. Fallat, Unpublished Decision (1-16-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State of Ohio v. Smith (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Ivory, Unpublished Decision (11-14-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)
State v. Jones, Unpublished Decision (6-12-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State v. Thomas, Unpublished Decision (5-1-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State v. Hutchins, Unpublished Decision (4-17-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State v. Wyley, Unpublished Decision (4-17-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)
State v. Thornton, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2002) (Ohio Ct. App. 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Franklin App. No. 01AP-614. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed January 29, 2002:

“This case is before the court as the result of the filing of a motion to certify a conflict between ouiopinion issued December 20, 2001, and the now reported case of State v. Gilden (2001), 144 Ohio App.3d 69 [759 N.E.2d 468], We perceive a clear conflict and therefore certify the following issue:

“Is the practice of a trial court of allowing members of a jury to submit questions to the court and attorneys for possible submission to witnesses per se prejudicial to a criminal defendant?”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.