Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2002

In re Doe

In re Doe
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 9, 2002 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Record, Resnick, Seal, Stratton, Sweeney, Would
95 Ohio St. 3d 1444; 767 N.E.2d 731

In re Doe

Opinion of the Court

Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness, No. 198. On February 8, 2002, the Board of Commissioners on Character and Fitness filed its final report in this court pursuant to Gov.Bar R. I(12)(E), recommending that the applicant, John Doe, not be approved for admission to the practice of law and that he not be permitted to reapply. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the board is accepted. The applicant is denied admission to practice in Ohio and shall not be permitted to reapply.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., dissents in part because she would not seal the record.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑