Ohio Supreme Court, 2002

State ex rel. Dunn v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 21, 2002 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

96 Ohio St. 3d 191

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State ex rel. Dunn v. Indus. Comm. (Ohio 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Dissenting Opinion

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.