In re Maloney

Ohio Supreme Court August 16, 2002

In re Maloney, 96 Ohio St. 3d 307 (Ohio 2002)

Authority, Bicknell, Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Parties, Pfeifer, Resnick, Should, Show, Stratton, Sweeney, Why, Would

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} Oral argument is cancelled.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re Bicknell, 96 Ohio St.3d 76, 2002-0hio-3615, 771 N.E.2d 846.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., would order the parties to show cause why this cause should not be decided on the authority of In re Bicknell. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 3} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re Bicknell, 96 Ohio St.3d 76, 2002-0hio-3615, 771 N.E.2d 846, ¶ 19-21.

Reference

Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published