Ohio Supreme Court, 2002

In re Maloney

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 16, 2002 · Authority, Bicknell, Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Parties, Pfeifer, Resnick, Should, Show, Stratton, Sweeney, Why, Would

96 Ohio St. 3d 307

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Wurgler (Medina County Court of Common Pleas 2005)
In re Maloney (Ohio 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} Oral argument is cancelled.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of In re Bicknell, 96 Ohio St.3d 76, 2002-0hio-3615, 771 N.E.2d 846.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., would order the parties to show cause why this cause should not be decided on the authority of In re Bicknell. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 3} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re Bicknell, 96 Ohio St.3d 76, 2002-0hio-3615, 771 N.E.2d 846, ¶ 19-21.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.