Ohio Supreme Court, 2002

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 4, 2002 · Cook, Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

96 Ohio St. 3d 1201; 770 N.E.2d 73

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas (Ohio 2002)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Monica Ann Hansen Klaas, Attorney Registration No. 0065095, last known business address in Millersburg, Ohio.

{¶2} The court coming now to consider its order of February 21, 2001, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with six months stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Monica Ann Hansen Klaas be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Disciplinary Counsel v. Klaas (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 86, 742 N.E.2d 612.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.