Corpline v. Hamilton County Board of Revision
Corpline v. Hamilton County Board of Revision
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to remand,
{¶ 2} IT IS ORDERED by the court that the joint motion to remand be, and it hereby is, sustained. We acknowledge that under Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision, 96 Ohio St.3d 165, 2002-Ohio-4033, 772 N.E.2d 1160, the appeal may have been filed before the start of the running of the appeal time set forth in R.C. 5717.01. Nevertheless, in the interests of justice and to
{¶ 3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to bear their respective costs herein expended, that a mandate be sent to the Board of Tax Appeals to carry this judgment into execution, and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry.
Reference
- Status
- Published