Hooten v. Safe Auto Ins.
Hooten v. Safe Auto Ins.
97 Ohio St. 3d 1420; 777 N.E.2d 275
Hooten v. Safe Auto Ins.
Opinion of the Court
Hamilton App. No. C-010576. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ entry dated August 2, 2002:
“Must a trial court, before ruling on a motion for summary judgment under Civ.R. 56, either set an oral or non-oral hearing date or establish a cut-off date for parties to submit affidavits or materials opposing the motion?”
The conflict ease is Hall v. Klien (Sept. 3, 1999), Wood App. No. WD-99-001, 1999 WL 682584.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.