State v. Gross

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Gross, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1486 (Ohio 2002)
780 N.E.2d 288
Grant, Motion, Reconsideration, Resnicic, State, Stratton

State v. Gross

Opinion of the Court

Muskingum App. No. CT96-055. Reported at 97 Ohio St.3d 121, 2002-Ohio-5524, 776 N.E.2d 1061. On pro-se motion for reconsideration and motion for reconsideration. Motions denied.

Resnicic and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent in part because they would grant the state’s motion for reconsideration.

Reference

Status
Published
↑