Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

State v. Wright

State v. Wright
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 9, 2003 · Connor, Cook, Cooney, Eighth, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
98 Ohio St. 3d 1212; 785 N.E.2d 755

State v. Wright

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified; there is want of a conflict.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cooney, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., dissent. Colleen Conway Cooney, J., of the Eighth Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J. Carol A. Wright, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, David M. Gormley, State Solicitor, and Kirk A. Lindsey, Associate Solicitor, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Attorney General of Ohio. David L. Doughten and Paul Skendelas, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.