Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

State v. Weirtz

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided January 15, 2003 · Connor, Resnick, Sweeney

98 Ohio St. 3d 1407; 781 N.E.2d 1017

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Kirby, Unpublished Decision (6-9-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Delaware App. No. 02CAC06032, 2002-Ohio-5294. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry dated October 28, 2002:

“Does State v. Homan [2000], 89 Ohio St.3d 421, 2002-Ohio-212 [732 N.E.2d 952], preclude a law enforcement officer from testifying at trial regarding observations made during a defendant’s *1408performance of nonscientific standardized field sobriety tests when those tests are not administered in strict compliance with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration guidelines?”

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent. O’Connor, J., not participating.

The conflict cases are State v. Brandenburg, Montgomery App. No. 18836, 2002-Ohio-912; State v. Schmitt, Mercer App. No. 10-01-16, 2002-Ohio-4615; and State v. Pingor, Franklin App. No. 01AP-302, 2001-Ohio-4088.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.