Poulton v. Am. Economy Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court May 7, 2003

Poulton v. Am. Economy Ins., 98 Ohio St. 3d 1564 (Ohio 2003)

787 N.E.2d 1230

Allow, Law, Pfeifer, Propositions, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

Stark App. Nos. 2002CA00038 and 2002CA00061, 2002-Ohio-7214. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II; cause consolidated with 2003-0415, Poulton v. Am. Economy Ins. Co., Stark App. Nos. 2002CA00038 and 2002CA00061, 2002-Ohio-7214; causes held for the decision in 2002-1126 and 2002-1433, Allen v. Johnson, Wayne App. Nos. 01CA0046 and 01CA0047, 2002-Ohio-3404; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs but would allow all propositions of law. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name: Poulton v. Am. Economy Ins. Co.
Status: Published