Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

Poulton v. Am. Economy Ins.

Poulton v. Am. Economy Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 7, 2003 · Allow, Law, Pfeifer, Propositions, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
98 Ohio St. 3d 1564; 787 N.E.2d 1230

Poulton v. Am. Economy Ins.

Opinion of the Court

Stark App. Nos. 2002CA00038 and 2002CA00061, 2002-Ohio-7214. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II; cause consolidated with 2003-0415, Poulton v. Am. Economy Ins. Co., Stark App. Nos. 2002CA00038 and 2002CA00061, 2002-Ohio-7214; causes held for the decision in 2002-1126 and 2002-1433, Allen v. Johnson, Wayne App. Nos. 01CA0046 and 01CA0047, 2002-Ohio-3404; and briefing schedule stayed.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs but would allow all propositions of law. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑