Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education

Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 16, 2003 · Con, Cook, Moyer, Nor, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
99 Ohio St. 3d 48

Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. I is allowed. Briefing is to proceed on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The cause is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on Proposition of Law No. II consistent with Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn., 97 Ohio St.3d 451, 2002-Ohio-6718, 780 N.E.2d 543.

Robert J. Vecchio Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Vecchio, for appellants. Lutz & Oxley Co., L.P.A., Fred M. Oxley and Erin N. Cahill, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. Cook, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑