Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 16, 2003 · Con, Cook, Moyer, Nor, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

99 Ohio St. 3d 48

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Yates v. Mansfield Board of Education (Ohio 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal on Proposition of Law No. I is allowed. Briefing is to proceed on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The cause is allowed on Proposition of Law No. II. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings on Proposition of Law No. II consistent with Hubbard v. Canton City School Bd. of Edn., 97 Ohio St.3d 451, 2002-Ohio-6718, 780 N.E.2d 543.

Robert J. Vecchio Co., L.P.A., and Robert J. Vecchio, for appellants. Lutz & Oxley Co., L.P.A., Fred M. Oxley and Erin N. Cahill, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. Cook, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.