Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

State v. Smith

State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 11, 2003 · Con, Cook, Moyer, Nor, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
99 Ohio St. 3d 140; 789 N.E.2d 234

State v. Smith

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} Propositions of Law Nos. II through VI are dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on Proposition of Law No. I on the authority of State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 2003-Ohio-2761, 789 N.E.2d 222.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Renee L. Snow, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑