Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

State v. Harrold

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 27, 2003 · Comer, Connor, Decisis, Donnell, Grady, Moyer, Ohio, Only, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stated, Stratton, Sweeney

99 Ohio St. 3d 473

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Harrold, Unpublished Decision (8-25-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for resentencing on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. O’Connor, J., concurs in judgment based only on stare decisis. Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Stephen P. Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents for the reasons stated in Judge Grady’s dissenting opinion in State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.