Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

Workman v. Carlisle Engineered Products, Inc.

Workman v. Carlisle Engineered Products, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 16, 2003 · Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney
99 Ohio St. 3d 1415; 788 N.E.2d 1098
Workman v. Carlisle Engineered Products, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 81179 and 81211, 2003-Ohio-293.

Discretionary appeal denied on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent, would allow, and would hold on this proposition of law for the decision in Taylor v. Kemper Ins. Co., Cuyahoga App. No. 81360, 2003-0hio-177.

Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. II and cause held for the decision in 2002-0803 and 2002-0837, German v. Therm-O-Disc, Inc., Richland App. No. 01CA512, 2002-0hio-1848; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. Ill and cause held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903; briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.