Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

State v. Colbert

State v. Colbert
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 30, 2003 · Allow, Connor, Deny, Donnell, Law, Moot, Moyer, Pfeifer, Propositions, Resnick, Sweeney
99 Ohio St. 3d 1508; 792 N.E.2d 196

State v. Colbert

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 80361, 2002-0hio-6315. On motion to dismiss the state of Ohio’s appeal. Motion denied.

F.E. Sweeney and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.

On motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of the cross-appeal. Motion granted and cross-appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur but would also allow all other propositions of law. F.E. Sweeney and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would deny. O’Connor, J., dissents and would deny as moot.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑