Frisch v. CNA Commercial Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court
Frisch v. CNA Commercial Ins. Co., 99 Ohio St. 3d 1511 (Ohio 2003)
792 N.E.2d 199
Allow, App, Burkhart, Connor, Donnell, Galatis, Hio, Hold, Ill, Ins, Law, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Proposition, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney, Would

Frisch v. CNA Commercial Ins. Co.

Opinion of the Court

Seneca App. Nos. 13-02-36 and 13-02-40, 2003-0hio-1574. Discretionary appeal allowed, cause consolidated with 2003-0981, Frisch v. CNA Commercial Ins. Co., Seneca App. Nos. 13-02-36 and 13-02^40, 2003-Ohio-1574, causes held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark *1512App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903, and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur. Pfeifer, J., concurs but would also hold for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-0hio-1502. F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs but would not hold for the decision in Burkhart. O’Donnell, J., concurs in part, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I and hold for Burkhart, and would allow on Proposition of Law No. Ill and hold for Galatis. O’Connor, J., concurs in part and would allow on Proposition of Law No. I only and hold for Burkhart. Resnick, J., dissents.

Reference

Status
Published