Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

Frisch v. CNA Commercial Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 30, 2003 · Allow, App, Burkhart, Connor, Donnell, Galatis, Hio, Hold, Ill, Ins, Law, Moyer, Only, Pfeifer, Proposition, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney, Would

99 Ohio St. 3d 1511; 792 N.E.2d 199

Opinion of the Court

Seneca App. Nos. 13-02-36 and 13-02-40, 2003-0hio-1574. Discretionary appeal allowed, cause consolidated with 2003-0981, Frisch v. CNA Commercial Ins. Co., Seneca App. Nos. 13-02-36 and 13-02^40, 2003-Ohio-1574, causes held for the decision in 2002-0579, Burkhart v. CNA Ins. Co., Stark *1512App. No. 2001CA00265, 2002-0hio-903, and briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., concur. Pfeifer, J., concurs but would also hold for the decision in 2002-0932, Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, Summit App. No. 20784, 2002-0hio-1502. F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs but would not hold for the decision in Burkhart. O’Donnell, J., concurs in part, would allow on Proposition of Law No. I and hold for Burkhart, and would allow on Proposition of Law No. Ill and hold for Galatis. O’Connor, J., concurs in part and would allow on Proposition of Law No. I only and hold for Burkhart. Resnick, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.