Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co.

Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 30, 2003 · Allow, Connor, Donnell, Law, Moyer, Pfeifer, Propositions, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
99 Ohio St. 3d 1512; 792 N.E.2d 199

Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co.

Opinion of the Court

Ross App. No. 02CA2653, 2003-0hio-1708. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I only, cause consolidated with 2003-1018, Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co., Ross App. No. 02CA2653, 2003-0hio-1708, causes held for the decision in 2003-0474, Kyle v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co., Lucas App. No. L-02-1166, 2003-Ohio-488, and briefing schedule stayed.

O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur but would also allow all other propositions of law. Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑