Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

In re Williams

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 10, 2003 · Sweeney

99 Ohio St. 3d 1540; 795 N.E.2d 680

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

In re J.W. (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
In re Williams (Ohio 2004)
In re Ridenour, Unpublished Decision (4-16-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
In the Matter of Holt, Unpublished Decision (10-21-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Geauga App. Nos. 2003-G-2498 and 2003-G-2499, 2003-0hio-3550. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry:

“Whether children who are the subject of a motion to terminate parental rights are ‘parties’ to that proceeding for the purposes of Juv.R. 4(A) and R.C. 2151.352, requiring the appointment of counsel.”

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

The conflict case is In re Alfrey, 2d Dist. No. 01CA0083, 2003-0hio-608, 2003 WL 262587.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.