Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

State v. Barksdale

State v. Barksdale
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 10, 2003 · Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
99 Ohio St. 3d 1549

State v. Barksdale

Opinion of the Court

Montgomery App. No. 19294, 2003-Ohio-43. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals, for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, sustained.

It is further ordered by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑