Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

State v. Barksdale

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 10, 2003 · Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

99 Ohio St. 3d 1549

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Hickman, Unpublished Decision (7-23-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Montgomery App. No. 19294, 2003-Ohio-43. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals, for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss be, and hereby is, sustained.

It is further ordered by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.