State v. Newman
Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Newman, 100 Ohio St. 3d 24 (Ohio 2003)
795 N.E.2d 663
Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
State v. Newman
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.
Concurring Opinion
concurring.
{¶ 2} Although I dissented in State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473, I recognize that Comer is now the law. As such, the sentencing procedure for ordering a consecutive sentence should be the same as for ordering a maximum sentence. Thus, I concur here.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
{¶ 3} For the reasons expressed in Judge Grady’s dissent in State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473,I respectfully dissent.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The State of Ohio v. Newman
- Cited By
- 26 cases
- Status
- Published