Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

State v. Newman

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided September 24, 2003 · Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

100 Ohio St. 3d 24; 795 N.E.2d 663

Cases that cite this one

26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Gallagher v. Wmk Inc., Unpublished Decision (12-12-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
State v. Streeter (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Hooper, Unpublished Decision (12-27-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Aylward (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Langley, Unpublished Decision (5-14-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. O'neal, 06ca0056-M (3-24-2008) (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
Stone v. Cazeau, Unpublished Decision (11-26-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
State v. Heidelburg, Unpublished Decision (2-3-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
State v. Reen, Unpublished Decision (4-29-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Montgomery, Unpublished Decision (5-16-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Neighbor, Unpublished Decision (3-4-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Pearce, Unpublished Decision (6-30-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Perry, Unpublished Decision (12-9-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Combs, Unpublished Decision (4-25-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Mitchell, Unpublished Decision (7-29-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Mathews, Unpublished Decision (11-18-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)
State v. Kennedy, Unpublished Decision (3-29-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Meenach, Unpublished Decision (4-12-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Sprowls, Unpublished Decision (11-26-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Hampton, Unpublished Decision (1-12-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Curd, Unpublished Decision (12-30-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Hart, Unpublished Decision (8-30-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Cotton, Unpublished Decision (8-23-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Howard, Unpublished Decision (2-2-2004) (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Ulsh, Unpublished Decision (11-7-2003) (Ohio Ct. App. 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. O’Connor, J., concurs separately. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Concurring Opinion

O’Connor, J.,

concurring.

{¶ 2} Although I dissented in State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473, I recognize that Comer is now the law. As such, the sentencing procedure for ordering a consecutive sentence should be the same as for ordering a maximum sentence. Thus, I concur here.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 3} For the reasons expressed in Judge Grady’s dissent in State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473,I respectfully dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.