State v. Dade

Ohio Supreme Court September 24, 2003

State v. Dade, 100 Ohio St. 3d 30 (Ohio 2003)

Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. Brown, 99 Ohio St.3d 323, 2003-Ohio-3931, 792 N.E.2d 175.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Steven L. Taylor, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Yeura Venters, Franklin County Public Defender, and Allen V. Adair, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent. O’Donnell, J., not participating.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons expressed in Justice O’Connor’s well-reasoned dissent in State v. Brown, 99 Ohio St.3d 323, 2003-Ohio-3931, 792 N.E.2d 175, ¶ 26-32.

O’Connor, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name: The State of Ohio v. Dade
Status: Published