Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

Barnhill v. City of Hamilton

Barnhill v. City of Hamilton
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided October 8, 2003 · Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
100 Ohio St. 3d 66

Barnhill v. City of Hamilton

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on Proposition of Law No. I is affirmed on the authority of Armstrong v. Best Buy Co., Inc., 99 Ohio St.3d 79, 2003-Ohio-2573, 788 N.E.2d 1088.

{¶ 2} Proposition of Law No. II is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑