Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

In re Price

Ohio Supreme Court
In re Price, 100 Ohio St. 3d 204 (Ohio 2003)
797 N.E.2d 976
Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

In re Price

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent with In re Thomas, 100 Ohio St.3d 89, 2003-Ohio-5162, 796 N.E.2d 908.

Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael D. Baker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee state of Ohio. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Molly J. McAnespie, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant David Price. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re Thomas, 100 Ohio St.3d 89, 2003-Ohio-5162, 796 N.E.2d 908, I would also allow credit for the appellant’s time spent at the Butler County Rehabilitation Center against the time of his commitment to the Department of Youth Services. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
In re Price, a Minor
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
↑