Ohio Supreme Court, 2003

In re Price

In re Price
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided November 5, 2003 · Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
100 Ohio St. 3d 204; 797 N.E.2d 976
In re Price

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the juvenile court for further proceedings consistent with In re Thomas, 100 Ohio St.3d 89, 2003-Ohio-5162, 796 N.E.2d 908.

Robin N. Piper, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael D. Baker, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee state of Ohio. David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Molly J. McAnespie, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant David Price. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} For the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re Thomas, 100 Ohio St.3d 89, 2003-Ohio-5162, 796 N.E.2d 908, I would also allow credit for the appellant’s time spent at the Butler County Rehabilitation Center against the time of his commitment to the Department of Youth Services. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.