State v. Vasquez

Ohio Supreme Court
State v. Vasquez, 2004 Ohio 7016 (Ohio 2004)
104 Ohio St. 3d 507; 820 N.E.2d 370
Moyer, Resnick, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Sweeney

State v. Vasquez

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted on Proposition of Law No. 5.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of State v. White, 103 Ohio St.3d 580, 2004-Ohio-5989, 817 N.E.2d 393.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents. *508 Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Laura M. Rayce, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Yeura R. Venters, Franklin County Public Defender, and David L. Strait, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State of Ohio, Appellee, v. Vasquez, Appellant
Status
Published