Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

State ex rel. Shandrow v. Roper Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Shandrow v. Roper Corp., 101 Ohio St. 3d 194 (Ohio 2004)
803 N.E.2d 799
Comm, Connor, Donnell, Indus, Moyer, Ohio, Pfeifer, Pursuant, Rel, Resnick, State, Stratton, Sweeney, Would

State ex rel. Shandrow v. Roper Corp.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Stephen E. Mindzak Law Offices, L.L.C., and Stephen E. Mindzak, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Phil Wright Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent, would reverse, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State ex rel. Shandrow v. Roper Corporation Industrial Commission of Ohio
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published
↑