Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2004

State ex rel. Shandrow v. Roper Corp.

State ex rel. Shandrow v. Roper Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 3, 2004 · Comm, Connor, Donnell, Indus, Moyer, Ohio, Pfeifer, Pursuant, Rel, Resnick, State, Stratton, Sweeney, Would
101 Ohio St. 3d 194; 803 N.E.2d 799

State ex rel. Shandrow v. Roper Corp.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Stephen E. Mindzak Law Offices, L.L.C., and Stephen E. Mindzak, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Phil Wright Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent, would reverse, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑