Ohio Supreme Court, 2004

State ex rel. Shandrow v. Roper Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided March 3, 2004 · Comm, Connor, Donnell, Indus, Moyer, Ohio, Pfeifer, Pursuant, Rel, Resnick, State, Stratton, Sweeney, Would

101 Ohio St. 3d 194; 803 N.E.2d 799

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

State ex rel. Akron Paint & Varnish, Inc. v. Gullotta (Ohio 2012)
State ex rel. Moore v. International Truck & Engine (Ohio 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Stephen E. Mindzak Law Offices, L.L.C., and Stephen E. Mindzak, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Phil Wright Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent, would reverse, and would order relief pursuant to State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm. (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.