Ponser v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Ponser v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} Case Nos. 2003-1730 and 2003-2125 are consolidated.
Case No. 2003-1730
{¶ 2} The discretionary appeal is accepted.
{¶ 3} The judgment against St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company is reversed, sua sponte, on the authority of Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256. The remaining insurance companies, Motorists Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Insurance Company, are to brief the issues.
Case No. 2003-2125
{¶ 4} The certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Licking County is accepted only on the question certified on behalf of Motorists Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Insurance Company, which states:
{¶ 5} “If an insured does not file a wrongful death suit against the tortfeasor with[in] the two year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. [2125.02(D)], is he or she ‘legally entitled to recover damages’ against the tortfeasor under R.C. 3937.18 and, therefore, able to maintain an un[der]insured or uninsured motorists claim[?]”
{¶ 6} The judgments against Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company and St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company are, sua sponte, reversed on the authority of Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 2003-Ohio-5849, 797 N.E.2d 1256. The remaining insurance companies, Motorists Mutual Insurance Company and Nationwide Insurance Company, are to brief the certified question quoted above.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Ponser, Admr. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, (Two Cases.)
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published