Ohio Supreme Court, 2004

State v. Roe

State v. Roe
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 2, 2004 · Stratton, Sweeney
101 Ohio St. 3d 1448; 802 N.E.2d 1123

State v. Roe

Opinion of the Court

Franklin App. No. 86AP-59. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for expedited stay of death sentence, appellant’s motion to supplement motion for expedited stay of death sentence, and appellant’s pro se motion for stay of death sentence,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to supplement be, and hereby is, granted.

F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motions for stay of death sentence be, and hereby are, denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.