Ohio Supreme Court, 2004

State ex rel. Szabo v. Wiseman

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided February 6, 2004 · Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

101 Ohio St. 3d 1451; 802 N.E.2d 1125

Opinion of the Court

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to dismiss and relator’s motion for immediate protection,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for immediate protection be denied and that the motion to dismiss be sustained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.