Ohio Supreme Court, 2004

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Fishman

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Fishman
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided April 9, 2004 · Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
102 Ohio St. 3d 1213

Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Fishman

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Andrew Martin Fishman, Attorney Registration No. 0031290, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 26, 2002, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that respondent be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 5} For earlier case, see Columbus Bar Assn. v. Fishman, 98 Ohio St.3d 172, 2002-Ohio-7086, 781 N.E.2d 204.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.