Witt v. Ohio Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
Cases that cite this one
39 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. Johnson (Ohio 2005)
- Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Ohio Dept. of Edn. (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2018)
- Miller v. Miller (Ohio 2012)
- Hudson v. Petrosurance, Inc. (Ohio 2010)
- State ex rel. Carnail v. McCormick (Ohio 2010)
- State v. Robinson (Ohio Ct. App. 2010)
- State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. Brunner (Ohio 2009)
- Gabbard v. Madison Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2021)
- State ex rel. Cable News Network, Inc. v. Bellbrook-Sugarcreek Local Schools (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2020)
- Plush v. Cincinnati (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- In re Application of Ohio Edison Co. (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2019)
- State v. Wheeler (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- State ex rel. Schiffbauer v. Banaszak (Ohio 2015)
- State v. Stoffer (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
- In re Kudela (United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio 2010)
- State Ex Rel. Knowlton v. Noble County Board of Elections (Ohio 2010)
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton County Board of Commissioners v. Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (Ohio 2010)
- State Ex Rel. Lucas County Republican Party Executive Committee v. Brunner (Ohio 2010)
- State ex rel. AK Steel Corp. v. Davis (Ohio 2009)
- State ex rel. Mager v. State Teachers Retirement Sys. of Ohio (Ohio 2009)
- State ex rel. Stoll v. Logan County Board of Elections (Ohio 2008)
- Hyle v. Porter (Ohio 2008)
- State ex rel. Summit County Republican Party Executive Committee v. Brunner (Ohio 2008)
- State ex rel. Colvin v. Brunner (Ohio 2008)
- City of Lima v. State (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded for disposition in accordance with Katz v. Ohio Ins. Guar. Assn., 103 Ohio St.3d 4, 2004-Ohio-4109, 812 N.E.2d 1266.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting.
{¶ 2} Because I agree with the analysis of the court of appeals that only one covered claim exists for purposes of Ohio Insurance Guaranty Association’s (“OIGA”) exposure, I respectfully dissent. In Katz v. Ohio Ins. Guar. Assn., 103 Ohio St.3d 4, 2004-Ohio-4109, 812 N.E.2d 1266, I dissented from that part of the majority’s judgment that obligated OIGA to pay more than the statutory maximum limit of $300,000 for one medical malpractice action. For the same reasons here, I do not agree that OIGA should be obligated for more than one covered claim in this matter.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.