Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

State ex rel. Bodnar v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court
State ex rel. Bodnar v. Industrial Commission, 104 Ohio St. 3d 162 (Ohio 2004)
Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney, Would

State ex rel. Bodnar v. Industrial Commission

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Law Offices of Thomas Tootle Co., L.P.A., and Thomas Tootle, for appellant. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Paul H. Tonks, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. Hanna, Campbell & Powell, L.L.P., and Lori A. Fricke, for appellee Shelly & Sands, Inc. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Reference

Full Case Name
The State ex rel. Bodnar v. Industrial Commission of Ohio
Status
Published
↑