In re Gill

Ohio Supreme Court December 22, 2004

In re Gill, 104 Ohio St. 3d 654 (Ohio 2004)

821 N.E.2d 559

Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re Nowak, 104 Ohio St.3d 466, 2004-Ohio-6777, 820 N.E.2d 335.

O’Donnell, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The certified question of state law is answered in the affirmative on the authority of In re Nowak, 104 Ohio St.3d 466, 2004-Ohio-6777, 820 N.E.2d 335.

McFadden & Associates Co., L.P.A., and David A. Freeburg, for petitioner, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease L.L.P., and Lisa Pierce Reisz, for respondent, Frederick L. Ransier III, trustee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Reference

Status: Published