Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2004

In re Gill

In re Gill
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided December 22, 2004 · Connor, Donnell, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton, Sweeney
104 Ohio St. 3d 654; 821 N.E.2d 559

In re Gill

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in In re Nowak, 104 Ohio St.3d 466, 2004-Ohio-6777, 820 N.E.2d 335.

O’Donnell, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The certified question of state law is answered in the affirmative on the authority of In re Nowak, 104 Ohio St.3d 466, 2004-Ohio-6777, 820 N.E.2d 335.

McFadden & Associates Co., L.P.A., and David A. Freeburg, for petitioner, ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease L.L.P., and Lisa Pierce Reisz, for respondent, Frederick L. Ransier III, trustee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Connor, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑