Ohio Supreme Court, 2005

Bentley v. Pendleton

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 4, 2005 · Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton

105 Ohio St. 3d 326

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Bentley v. Pendleton, Unpublished Decision (6-29-2005) (Ohio Ct. App. 2005)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Dissenting Opinion

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} For reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Gilchrist v. Gonsor, 104 Ohio St.3d 599, 2004-Ohio-7103, 821 N.E.2d 154, ¶ 14-23, I respectfully dissent.

Lanzinger, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Gilchrist v. Gonsor, 104 Ohio St.3d 599, 2004-Ohio-7103, 821 N.E.2d 154, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of the remaining assignments of error and for further proceedings not inconsistent with Gilchrist v. Gonsor.

Robert W. Kerpsack Co., L.P.A, and Robert W. Kerpsack, for appellants. Wiles, Boyle, Burkholder & Bringardner Co., L.P.A., Michael L. Close, and Dale D. Cook; Janik & Dorman, L.L.P., Stacy Lilly, and Matthew Grimm, for appellee. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lundberg Stratton and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.