Ohio Supreme Court, 2005

Akins v. Harco Insurance

Akins v. Harco Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 27, 2005 · Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
106 Ohio St. 3d 41
Akins v. Harco Insurance

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal of Old Republic Insurance Company is accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 2} The discretionary appeal of Owners Insurance Company is not accepted.

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed insofar as it holds that extrinsic evidence may not be used to establish a valid offer of uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of Hollon v. Clary, 104 Ohio St.3d 526, 2004-Ohio-6772, 820 N.E.2d 881.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent. Lanzinger, J., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.