State ex rel. Washington v. Crush
Cases that cite this one
26 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- State ex rel. Jones v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)
- State ex rel. Gerald v. Court of Claims (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State ex rel. Ware v. Bur. of Sentence Computation (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State ex rel. Hunt v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State ex rel. Honzu v. Ohio Parole Bd. (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State ex rel. Hatfield v. French (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State ex rel. Jones v. State (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State ex rel. Montelongo-Rangel v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Ohio Ct. App. 2020)
- State ex rel. Berry v. Bessey (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State ex rel. Anderson v. Sheeran (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State ex rel. Robinson v. Adult Parole Auth. (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State ex rel. Simpson v. Bradley (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State ex rel. Battin v. Lynch (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State ex rel. England v. Franklin Cty. Clerk's Office (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
- State ex rel. Hairston v. State (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State ex. rel. Hairston v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State ex rel. Newcomb v. Thalheimer (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State ex rel. Keith v. Adult Parole Auth. (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State ex rel. Davis v. Holbrook (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
- State ex rel. Richardson v. Cocroft (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
- State ex rel. Lacking v. Woods (Ohio Ct. App. 2016)
- State ex rel. Kirin v. Evans (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- Kirin v. D'Apolito (Ohio Ct. App. 2015)
- State ex rel. Frazier v. Schneidner (Ohio Ct. App. 2014)
- State ex rel. Davet v. Sutula (Ohio 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
{¶ 1} In November 1991, appellant, William Washington Jr., filed a petition in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas. He requested a writ of habeas corpus to compel his immediate release from the county jail. In August 2004, Washington moved for summary judgment on his petition.
{¶ 2} In October 2004, Washington filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Judge Thomas A. Crush of the common pleas court, to rule upon his pending habeas corpus petition. Judge Crush moved to dismiss the mandamus petition. On November 4, 2004, the court of appeals granted Judge Crush’s motion and dismissed the petition.
{¶3} On November 17, 2004, Washington moved for reconsideration of the court of appeals’ dismissal of his mandamus petition. Washington claimed that his motion was brought under App.R. 26(A). On December 9, 2004, the court of appeals denied Washington’s motion for reconsideration.
{¶ 4} This cause is now before the court upon Washington’s appeal from the December 9, 2004 judgment.
{¶ 5} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Washington’s reconsideration motion was a nullity because his mandamus action was filed originally in the court of appeals, rendering App.R. 26(A) inapplicable. State ex rel. Burnes v.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.