Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2006

State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao

State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided May 3, 2006 · Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
109 Ohio St. 3d 81; 846 N.E.2d 25

State ex rel. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Bilbao

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur. Eastman & Smith, Ltd., Thomas A. Dixon, and Richard L. Johnson, for appellant. Gallon, Takacs, Boissoneau.lt & Schaffer Co., L.P.A., and Theodore A. Bowman, for appellee Amparo Bilbao. Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Andrew J. Alatis, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑