Ohio Supreme Court, 2006

In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes Cases

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided July 12, 2006 · Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton

109 Ohio St. 3d 518; 849 N.E.2d 985

Cases that cite this one

109 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

In re T.D.S. (Ohio 2024)
In re T.D.S. (Ohio 2024)
State v. Mole (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2016)
State v. Roberts (Ohio Ct. App. 2024)
State v. Curry (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
Cleveland v. Oles (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2017)
State v. Adams (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2015)
State v. Coston (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)
State v. Meadows (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
In re S.W. (Ohio Ct. App. 2022)
Woods v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2021)
State v. Laster (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
State v. Woods (Ohio Ct. App. 2018)
State v. Casteel (Ohio Ct. App. 2017)
Simpkins v. Grace Brethren Church of Delaware, Ohio (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2016)
State v. Aalim (Slip Opinion) (Ohio 2016)
Lopez, Roel Alvarez (Tex. App. 2015)
State v. Johnson (Ohio Ct. App. 2013)
State v. Bonham (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
State v. Arguelles (Ohio Ct. App. 2012)
State v. Whatley (Ohio Ct. App. 2011)
Skjervem v. State (Alaska Ct. App. 2009)
State v. Boice, 08ca24 (4-7-2009) (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)
State v. Porter (Ohio Ct. App. 2008)
State v. Leonard, C-060595 (6-29-2007) (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The following dispositions of currently pending appeals are hereby entered based on our decision in State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 2006-Ohio-856, 845 N.E.2d 470.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

{¶ 2} Discretionary appeals are accepted in the following cases, the judgments of the courts of appeals are reversed, and the causes are remanded to the trial courts for resentencing. If propositions of law are noted, such reversals apply only to those portions of the judgments of the courts of appeals as are implicated by the applicable propositions of law:

{¶ 3} 2006-0411. State v. Hall, Cuyahoga App. No. 85861, 2006-Ohio-89, 2006 WL 60777. Also reversed and remanded on the authority of State v. Mathis, 109 Ohio St.3d 54, 2006-Ohio-855, 846 N.E.2d 1, and State v. Saxon, 109 Ohio St.3d 176, 2006-Ohio-1245, 846 N.E.2d 824.

{¶ 4} 2006-0421. State v. Berry, Scioto App. No. 04CA2961, 2006-Ohio-244, 2006 WL 164919. Accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II.

{¶ 5} 2006-0455. State v. Perry, Ross App. No. 05CA2837, 2006-Ohio-219, 2006 WL 158861. Accepted on Proposition of Law No. I.

{¶ 6} 2006-0534. State v. Batin, Stark App. No. 2005CA00066, 2006-Ohio-512, 2006 WL 281052.

{¶ 7} 2006-0541. State v. LaBoy, Cuyahoga App. No. 86255, 2006-Ohio-168, 2006 WL 134827.

{¶ 8} The discretionary appeal is accepted in the following case, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing:

*519{¶ 9} 2006-0399. State v. Mozena, Hamilton App. No. C-050208, 2006-Ohio-717, 2006 WL 367096, and 2006-Ohio-1220, 2006 WL 664157.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.