Geretz v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Erie App. No. E-05-042, 2006-Ohio-321. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at paragraph 5 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Journal Entry filed January 27, 2006:
“Did the one-time special payment made by appellee General Motors Corporation to appellants constitute holiday pay remuneration such that appellant union members, laid off over the July 4,1998, holiday weekend due to a strike, were not entitled to unemployment compensation for that week?”
The conflict cases are Ashwell v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., Montgomery App. No. 20522, 2005-Ohio-1928; Brown v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., Defiance App. No. 4-05-07, 2005-Ohio-5887; Futey v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., Richland App. No. 04 CA 14, 2004-Ohio-5400; Rodriguez v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., Cuyahoga App. Nos. 86111 and 86134, 2006-Ohio-97; Nicolas v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., Franklin App. No. 04AP-771, 2005-Ohio-2635; and Burns v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs., Trumbull App. Nos. 2004-T-0071 and 2004-T-0072, 2005-Ohio-6290.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.