Ohio Supreme Court, 2006

Olynyk v. Andrish

Olynyk v. Andrish
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided June 21, 2006 · Pfeifer
109 Ohio St. 3d 1509; 849 N.E.2d 1029

Olynyk v. Andrish

Opinion of the Court

Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632. Reported at 109 Ohio St3.d 1420, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 531. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 9, 2006:

“Whether the double dismissal rule contained in Rule 41(A) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure applies to plaintiffs voluntary dismissal of claims pursuant to Rule 41(A)(2) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.”

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

The conflict case is Van Beusecum v. Continental Builders, Delaware App. No. 04-CAE-01-008, 2004-Ohio-7261.

*1510Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-0310, Olynyk v. Andrish, Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.