Ohio Supreme Court, 2006

Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 23, 2006 · Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton

110 Ohio St. 3d 157

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Doe v. Moe, Unpublished Decision (10-5-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Dissenting Opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 109 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-2625, 849 N.E.2d 268, ¶ 56-76.

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati 109 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-2625, 849 N.E.2d 268.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Resnick and Lanzinger, JJ., not participating.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.