Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Ohio Supreme Court, 2006

Miller v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati

Miller v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati
Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 23, 2006 · Connor, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Stratton
110 Ohio St. 3d 158

Miller v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati

Opinion of the Court

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 109 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-2625, 849 N.E.2d 268.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents. Resnick and Lanzinger, JJ., not participating.

Dissenting Opinion

Pfeifer, J.,

dissenting.

{¶ 2} I dissent for the reasons set forth in my dissenting opinion in Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati, 109 Ohio St.3d 491, 2006-Ohio-2625, 849 N.E.2d 268, ¶ 56-76.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑