Ohio Supreme Court, 2006

State v. Huffman

Ohio Supreme Court · Decided August 2, 2006 · Accept, Appeal, Connor, Lanzinger, Law, Only, Pfeifer, Proposition, Propositions, Resnick

110 Ohio St. 3d 1437; 852 N.E.2d 187

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. McCown, Unpublished Decision (11-16-2006) (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Hamilton App. No. C-050044, 165 Ohio App.3d 518, 2006-Ohio-1106. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I, II, and III; cause held for the decision in 2006-0105 and 2006-0216, State v. Tooley, Portage App. No. 2004-P-0064, 2005-Ohio-6709; and briefing schedule stayed.

Resnick, Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., would accept the appeal on all Propositions of Law. O’Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.